Potentiation of Toxicology with Proteomics: Toxicoproteomics
Abstract views: 236 / PDF downloads: 179Keywords:
Toxicoproteomics, , ecotoxicoproteomics, , toxicology, , proteomics,Abstract
Proteomics, which is called the identification phase of the proteome identifying all the proteins encoded by the genome, has an important place in solving the difficulties experienced in toxicology. Proteomics refers to the study of interactions with other proteins and macromolecules, structure, location, amount, post-translational modifications (PTM), function in tissues/cells of the proteome. With proteomic studies, new relationships between proteins and toxicopathological effects can be determined and it is revealed the information on the toxic action mechanisms of various substances, from metals to peroxisome proliferators. On the other hand, toxicoproteomics seeks to identify critical proteins and pathways in biological systems that respond to it and adversely affected by chemical and environmental exposures using protein expression technologies. Toxicoproteomics combines 3 discipline areas. These are 1) traditional toxicology and pathology 2) differential protein and gene expression analysis 3) systems biology. Toxicoproteomic studies are an important area that can provide critical tools for identification of biomarkers associated with exposure to toxic substances, assessing their reliability and designing appropriate measures that can minimize adverse effects. In this statement, it is aimed to emphasize the importance of proteomics in toxicology.
References
Bal SH, Budak F. 2013. Genomik, proteomik kavramlarına genel bakış ve uygulama alanları. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1): 65-69.
Bandow JE, Brötz H, Leichert LIO, Labischinski H, Hecker M. 2003. Proteomic approach to understanding antibiotic action. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 47(3): 948-955.
Başaran E, Aras S, Cansaran-duman D. 2010. Genomik, proteomik, metabolomik kavramlarına genel bakış ve uygulama alanları. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 67(2): 85-96.
Cho CW, Kim CW. 2006. Toxicoproteomics in the study of aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 11(3): 187.
Dowling VA, Sheehan D. 2006. Proteomics as a route to identification of toxicity targets in environmental toxicology. Proteomics, 6(20): 5597-5604.
Elrick MM, Walgren JL, Mitchell MD, Thompson DC. 2006. Proteomics: recent applications and new technologies. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 98(5): 432-441.
George J, Singh R, Mahmood Z, Shukla Y. 2010. Toxicoproteomics: new paradigms in toxicology research. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 20(7): 415-423.
Hogstrand C, Balesaria S, Glover CN. 2002. Application of genomics and proteomics for study of the integrated response to zinc exposure in a non-model fish species, the rainbow trout. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 133(4): 523-535.
Iguchi T, Watanabe H, Katsu Y. 2007. Toxicogenomics and ecotoxicogenomics for studying endocrine disruption and basic biology. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 153(1-3): 25-29.
Jung WW, Huh YE, Ryu JC, Lee EI, Sul DG. 2005. Development of proteomics and applications of proteomics in toxicology. Molecular & Cellular Toxicology, 1(1): 7-12.
Kennedy S. 2002. The role of proteomics in toxicology: identification of biomarkers of toxicity by protein expression analysis. Biomarkers, 7(4): 269-290.
Lam PK, Gray JS. 2001. Predicting effects of toxic chemicals in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42(3): 169-173.
Lemos MF, Soares AM, Correia AC, Esteves AC. 2010. Proteins in ecotoxicology–how, why and why not? Proteomics, 10(4): 873-887.
Ling XP, Zhu JY, Huang L, Huang HQ. 2009. Proteomic changes in response to acute cadmium toxicity in gill tissue of Paralichthys olivaceus. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 27(2): 212-218.
Linscheid MW. 2005. Quantitative proteomics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 381(1): 64-66.
López‐Barea J, Gómez‐Ariza JL. 2006. Environmental proteomics and metallomics. Proteomics, 6(S1): S51-S62.
Marko-Varga G. 2004. Proteomics principles and challenges. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 76(4): 829-837.
Martyniuk CJ, Alvarez S, McClung S, Villeneuve DL., Ankley GT, Denslow ND. 2009. Quantitative proteomic profiles of androgen receptor signaling in the liver of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Journal of Proteome Research, 8(5): 2186-2200.
Merrick BA. 2008. The plasma proteome, adductome and idiosyncratic toxicity in toxicoproteomics research. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, 7(1): 35-49.
Petricoin EF, Rajapaske V, Herman EH, Arekani AM, Ross S, Johann D, Sistare FD. 2004. Toxicoproteomics: serum proteomic pattern diagnostics for early detection of drug induced cardiac toxicities and cardioprotection. Toxicologic Pathology, 32(1_suppl): 122-130.
Piñeiro C, Vázquez J, Marina AI, Barros‐Velázquez J, Gallardo JM. 2001. Characterization and partial sequencing of species‐specific sarcoplasmic polypeptides from commercial hake species by mass spectrometry following two ‐ dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 22(8): 1545-1552.
Rabilloud T, Lescuyer P. 2015. Proteomics in mechanistic toxicology: History, concepts, achievements, caveats, and potential. Proteomics, 15(5-6): 1051-1074.
Shrader EA, Henry TR., Greeley MS., Bradley BP. 2003. Proteomics in zebrafish exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals. Ecotoxicology, 12(6): 485-488.
Wang N, MacKenzie L, De Souza AG, Zhong H, Goss G, Li L. 2007. Proteome Profile of Cytosolic Component of Zebrafish Liver Generated by LC− ESI MS/MS Combined with Trypsin Digestion and Microwave-Assisted Acid Hydrolysis. Journal of Proteome Research, 6(1): 263-272.
Wetmore BA, Merrick BA. 2004. Invited review: Toxicoproteomics: Proteomics applied to toxicology and pathology. Toxicologic Pathology, 32(6): 619-642.
Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, Appel RD, Humphery-Smith I, Hochstrasser DF, Williams KL. 1996. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 13(1): 19-50.
Wilson CR, Hooser SB. 2018. Toxicoproteomics in diagnostic toxicology. In Veterinary Toxicology (pp. 163-171). Academic Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Veterinary and Animal Research (IJVAR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
